Melies
Image Model Comparison

Flux Dev vs Nano Banana 2

Budget Flux Dev at 5 credits vs Google's premium at 15 — is the price gap justified?

Flux Dev from Black Forest Labs and Nano Banana 2 from Google represent two different approaches to AI image generation. Open-weight 12B model ideal for experimentation and custom workflows. On the other side, google's latest image model with exceptional text rendering and multi-image compositing.

At 10 credits, Flux Dev costs 5 credits less than Nano Banana 2 (15 credits). The question is whether the extra cost of Nano Banana 2 translates into meaningfully better results for your use case. For experimentation, custom workflows, good value, Flux Dev is hard to beat at its price point. But if you need text rendering, character consistency, multi-image compositing, Nano Banana 2 may justify the premium.

Updated March 2026

The Bottom Line

Flux Dev (10 credits) offers better value for everyday use, especially for experimentation. Nano Banana 2 (15 credits) is worth the premium when you need text rendering. Both are available on Melies — try each with a test prompt to see which fits your style.

Flux Dev vs Nano Banana 2: Visual Output

Both generated with the same prompt and seed 42. Click to view full size.

Black Forest LabsFlux Dev
GoogleNano Banana 2

Flux Dev vs Nano Banana 2: How They Compare

Black Forest LabsFlux Dev
GoogleNano Banana 2
ProviderBlack Forest LabsGoogle
ReleasedAug 2024Feb 2026
Cost
10
80.5K/151K/252K/404K
SpeedMediumFast
Reference imagesUp to 14
Editing
WebP output

Flux Dev vs Nano Banana 2: Cost Comparison

Flux Dev is 33% cheaper than Nano Banana 2. Here's how credits add up at scale.

VolumeFlux DevNano Banana 2
10 images 100 150
50 images 500 750
100 images 1,000 1,500

Strengths & Weaknesses

Black Forest Labs

Flux Dev

Strengths
  • + More affordable (10 vs 15 credits)
  • + Experimentation
  • + Open-weight model
  • + Acceleration modes (none/regular/high)
  • + Image-to-image editing
Weaknesses
  • - No reference image support
  • - No WebP output
Google

Nano Banana 2

Strengths
  • + Faster generation speed
  • + Text rendering
  • + Supports 14 reference images
  • + WebP output for smaller file sizes
  • + More resolution options
Weaknesses
  • - More expensive (15 vs 10 credits)

Flux Dev vs Nano Banana 2: Which to Pick?

On a tight budget

At 10 credits per image, Flux Dev gives you more generations for your plan. Good enough quality for most everyday use.

Flux Dev

Maximum quality matters

Nano Banana 2 is worth the extra credits when the output needs to be perfect — portfolio pieces, client work, or final deliverables.

Nano Banana 2

Character or style consistency

Nano Banana 2 supports 14 reference images to keep subjects, styles, and characters consistent across generations.

Nano Banana 2

Rapid iteration and testing

Nano Banana 2's fast generation means you can test more prompts in less time. Great for exploration.

Nano Banana 2

Flux Dev vs Nano Banana 2: FAQ

AI generated image
AI generated image
AI generated image
AI generated image

Try Flux Dev & Nano Banana 2

Compare Flux Dev, Nano Banana 2, and 15+ AI image models side by side. Switch models with one click, same credits.

Start Generating Images