Melies
Image Model Comparison

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst vs Nano Banana 2

OpenAI's precision flagship versus Google's multi-reference compositor. Sunburst at 20 credits versus Nano Banana 2 at 15 credits with up to 14 references.

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst from OpenAI and Nano Banana 2 from Google represent two different approaches to AI image generation. GPT Image 2.5 generation and editing with explicit sizes or automatic source sizing. On the other side, google's latest image model with exceptional text rendering and multi-image compositing.

At 15 credits, Nano Banana 2 costs 5 credits less than GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst (20 credits). The question is whether the extra cost of GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst translates into meaningfully better results for your use case. For text rendering, character consistency, multi-image compositing, Nano Banana 2 is hard to beat at its price point. But if you need hero stills, precision editing, photorealism, and production text rendering, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst may justify the premium.

Updated October 2026

The Bottom Line

Nano Banana 2 (15 credits) offers better value for everyday use, especially for text rendering. GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst (20 credits) is worth the premium when you need hero stills. Both are available on Melies — try each with a test prompt to see which fits your style.

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst vs Nano Banana 2: How They Compare

OpenAIGPT Image 2.5 Sunburst
GoogleNano Banana 2
ProviderOpenAIGoogle
ReleasedSep 2026Feb 2026
Cost
201K/302K
80.5K/151K/252K/404K
SpeedMediumFast
Reference imagesUp to 16Up to 14
Editing

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst vs Nano Banana 2: Cost Comparison

Nano Banana 2 is 25% cheaper than GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst. Here's how credits add up at scale.

VolumeGPT Image 2.5 SunburstNano Banana 2
10 images 200 150
50 images 1,000 750
100 images 2,000 1,500

Strengths & Weaknesses

OpenAI

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst

Strengths
  • + Hero stills
  • + Supports 16 reference images
  • + Generation and editing at medium quality
  • + 20 credits for 1K, 30 for 2K, or 40 for automatic sizing per output
  • + 20 additional credits per reference image per output
Weaknesses
  • - More expensive (20 vs 15 credits)
Google

Nano Banana 2

Strengths
  • + More affordable (15 vs 20 credits)
  • + Faster generation speed
  • + Text rendering
  • + More resolution options
  • + Up to 14 reference images
Weaknesses
  • - Higher price point relative to speed tier

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst vs Nano Banana 2: Which to Pick?

On a tight budget

At 15 credits per image, Nano Banana 2 gives you more generations for your plan. Good enough quality for most everyday use.

Nano Banana 2

Maximum quality matters

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst is worth the extra credits when the output needs to be perfect — portfolio pieces, client work, or final deliverables.

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst

Character or style consistency

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst supports 16 reference images to keep subjects, styles, and characters consistent across generations.

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst

Rapid iteration and testing

Nano Banana 2's fast generation means you can test more prompts in less time. Great for exploration.

Nano Banana 2

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst vs Nano Banana 2: FAQ

Practical answers before you start creating.

AI generated image
AI generated image
AI generated image
AI generated image

Try GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst & Nano Banana 2

Compare GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst, Nano Banana 2, and 15+ AI image models side by side. Switch models with one click, same credits.

Start Generating Images