Google's 5-credit speed model vs the cheapest Flux at 2 credits. Budget image generation compared.
Imagen 4 Fast from Google and Flux Schnell from Black Forest Labs represent two different approaches to AI image generation. Google's fast image model with high-quality generation at ultra-low cost. On the other side, the fastest Flux model — perfect for quick previews and prompt testing.
At 2 credits, Flux Schnell costs 3 credits less than Imagen 4 Fast (5 credits). The question is whether the extra cost of Imagen 4 Fast translates into meaningfully better results for your use case. For quick previews, testing prompts, iteration at lowest cost, Flux Schnell is hard to beat at its price point. But if you need fast iteration, budget-friendly generation, quick high-quality drafts, Imagen 4 Fast may justify the premium.
Updated April 2026
Imagen 4 Fast costs 3 credits more per generation — that adds up fast. Start with Flux Schnell for most work. It handles quick previews, testing prompts, iteration at lowest cost well. Save Imagen 4 Fast for when you specifically need fast iteration and the quality difference matters.
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Aug 2024 |
| Cost | 5 | 2 |
| Speed | Fastest | Fastest |
| Reference images | ||
| Editing | ||
| WebP output |
Flux Schnell is 60% cheaper than Imagen 4 Fast. Here's how credits add up at scale.
| Volume | Imagen 4 Fast | Flux Schnell |
|---|---|---|
| 10 images | 50 | 20 |
| 50 images | 250 | 100 |
| 100 images | 500 | 200 |
At 2 credits per image, Flux Schnell gives you more generations for your plan. Good enough quality for most everyday use.
Imagen 4 Fast is worth the extra credits when the output needs to be perfect — portfolio pieces, client work, or final deliverables.





Compare Imagen 4 Fast, Flux Schnell, and 15+ AI image models side by side. Switch models with one click, same credits.
Start Generating Images