Luma Ray 3.2 vs Grok Imagine Video
Luma's video-to-video control at 150 credits vs xAI's native audio and fast generation at 80 credits.
Luma Ray 3.2 from Luma and Grok Imagine Video from xAI represent two different approaches to AI video generation. Luma's cinematic video model with text, image, and video-to-video workflows at up to 1080p resolution. On the other side, xAI's #1 ranked video model with native audio, fast generation, and cinematic quality.
At 80 credits, Grok Imagine Video costs 70 credits less than Luma Ray 3.2 (150 credits). The question is whether the extra cost of Luma Ray 3.2 translates into meaningfully better results for your use case. For fast cinematic video with sound, image animation, video editing, Grok Imagine Video is hard to beat at its price point. But if you need cinematic video, video restyling, and ultrawide output, Luma Ray 3.2 may justify the premium.
Updated August 2026
Grok Imagine Video (80 credits) offers better value for everyday use, especially for fast cinematic video with sound. Luma Ray 3.2 (150 credits) is worth the premium when you need cinematic video. Both are available on Melies — try each with a test prompt to see which fits your style.
Luma Ray 3.2 vs Grok Imagine Video: How They Compare
 Luma Ray 3.2 |  Grok Imagine Video | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Luma | xAI |
| Released | Jun 2026 | Mar 2026 |
| Cost | 150 | 80 |
| Speed | Medium | Fast |
| Max duration | 10 seconds | 10 seconds |
| Image input | ||
| Audio | ||
| Resolutions | 540p, 720p, 1080p | 480p, 720p |
Luma Ray 3.2 vs Grok Imagine Video: Cost Comparison
Grok Imagine Video is 47% cheaper than Luma Ray 3.2. Here's how credits add up at scale.
| Volume | Luma Ray 3.2 | Grok Imagine Video |
|---|---|---|
| 5 videos | 750 | 400 |
| 10 videos | 1,500 | 800 |
| 25 videos | 3,750 | 2,000 |
Strengths & Weaknesses
Luma Ray 3.2
- + Cinematic video
- + 6 aspect ratio options including 21:9
- + 540p, 720p, and 1080p output
- + 5 and 10-second generation
- - More expensive (150 vs 80 credits)
- - No native audio
Grok Imagine Video
- + More affordable (80 vs 150 credits)
- + Faster generation speed
- + Fast cinematic video with sound
- + Native audio generation
- + #1 on multiple video leaderboards
- - Higher price point relative to speed tier
Luma Ray 3.2 vs Grok Imagine Video: Which to Pick?
Video with sound effects or dialogue
Grok Imagine Video generates native audio alongside the video — no need to add sound in post-production.
Producing multiple clips on a budget
At 80 credits per video, Grok Imagine Video lets you generate more clips and pick the best ones.
Cinematic quality for a hero clip
Luma Ray 3.2 is the premium option when every frame counts — final cuts, presentations, or social media covers.
Luma Ray 3.2 vs Grok Imagine Video: FAQ
Practical answers before you start creating.
Try Luma Ray 3.2 & Grok Imagine Video
Compare Luma Ray 3.2, Grok Imagine Video, and 10+ AI video models in one workspace. Switch models freely, same credits.
Start Creating Videos
