Melies
Video Model Comparison

WAN 3.0 Prime vs Veo 3.1

Compare Alibaba and Google for premium 1080p video, native audio, duration, and image control.

WAN 3.0 Prime from Alibaba and Veo 3.1 from Google represent two different approaches to AI video generation. Alibaba's premium WAN 3.0 tier with native audio, 1080p output, long clips, and first-last-frame control. On the other side, google's most advanced video model with native audio, 4K resolution, and reference image support.

At 280 credits, WAN 3.0 Prime costs 120 credits less than Veo 3.1 (400 credits). The question is whether the extra cost of Veo 3.1 translates into meaningfully better results for your use case. For long-form cinematic shots, audio-rich scenes, premium image animation, and controlled transitions, WAN 3.0 Prime is hard to beat at its price point. But if you need highest quality video with sound, cinematic 4k output, Veo 3.1 may justify the premium.

Updated September 2026

The Bottom Line

WAN 3.0 Prime (280 credits) offers better value for everyday use, especially for long-form cinematic shots. Veo 3.1 (400 credits) is worth the premium when you need highest quality video with sound. Both are available on Melies — try each with a test prompt to see which fits your style.

WAN 3.0 Prime vs Veo 3.1: How They Compare

AlibabaWAN 3.0 Prime
GoogleVeo 3.1
ProviderAlibabaGoogle
ReleasedAug 2026Oct 2025
Cost
280
400
SpeedMediumSlower
Max duration30 seconds8 seconds
Image input
Audio
Resolutions480p, 720p, 1080p720p, 1080p, 4K

WAN 3.0 Prime vs Veo 3.1: Cost Comparison

WAN 3.0 Prime is 30% cheaper than Veo 3.1. Here's how credits add up at scale.

VolumeWAN 3.0 PrimeVeo 3.1
5 videos 1,400 2,000
10 videos 2,800 4,000
25 videos 7,000 10,000

Strengths & Weaknesses

Alibaba

WAN 3.0 Prime

Strengths
  • + More affordable (280 vs 400 credits)
  • + Long-form cinematic shots
  • + Longer videos (up to 30s)
  • + Native synchronized audio
  • + Clips up to thirty seconds
Weaknesses
  • - Higher price point relative to speed tier
Google

Veo 3.1

Strengths
  • + Highest quality video with sound
  • + 4K resolution support
  • + Native audio generation
  • + Reference image input
  • + Safety tolerance 1–6
Weaknesses
  • - More expensive (400 vs 280 credits)
  • - Slower generation
  • - Shorter max duration (8s vs 30s)

WAN 3.0 Prime vs Veo 3.1: Which to Pick?

Longer clips for storytelling

WAN 3.0 Prime supports up to 30 second clips, giving you more room for complete scenes.

WAN 3.0 Prime

Producing multiple clips on a budget

At 280 credits per video, WAN 3.0 Prime lets you generate more clips and pick the best ones.

WAN 3.0 Prime

Cinematic quality for a hero clip

Veo 3.1 is the premium option when every frame counts — final cuts, presentations, or social media covers.

Veo 3.1

WAN 3.0 Prime vs Veo 3.1: FAQ

Practical answers before you start creating.

AI generated video
AI generated video
AI generated video
AI generated video

Try WAN 3.0 Prime & Veo 3.1

Compare WAN 3.0 Prime, Veo 3.1, and 10+ AI video models in one workspace. Switch models freely, same credits.

Start Creating Videos