Melies
Video Model Comparison

WAN v2.7 vs Grok Imagine Video

WAN's 15-second reference clips at 100 credits vs Grok's faster native-audio generation at 80 credits.

WAN v2.7 from Alibaba and Grok Imagine Video from xAI represent two different approaches to AI video generation. Alibaba's latest video model with 1080p output, reference-to-video, and up to 15-second clips. On the other side, xAI's #1 ranked video model with native audio, fast generation, and cinematic quality.

At 80 credits, Grok Imagine Video costs 20 credits less than WAN v2.7 (100 credits). The question is whether the extra cost of WAN v2.7 translates into meaningfully better results for your use case. For fast cinematic video with sound, image animation, video editing, Grok Imagine Video is hard to beat at its price point. But if you need multi-shot storytelling, reference-based generation, longer 1080p clips, WAN v2.7 may justify the premium.

Updated August 2026

The Bottom Line

Grok Imagine Video (80 credits) offers better value for everyday use, especially for fast cinematic video with sound. WAN v2.7 (100 credits) is worth the premium when you need multi-shot storytelling. Both are available on Melies — try each with a test prompt to see which fits your style.

WAN v2.7 vs Grok Imagine Video: How They Compare

AlibabaWAN v2.7
xAIGrok Imagine Video
ProviderAlibabaxAI
ReleasedJul 2026Mar 2026
Cost
100
80
SpeedMediumFast
Max duration15 seconds10 seconds
Image input
Audio
Resolutions720p, 1080p480p, 720p

WAN v2.7 vs Grok Imagine Video: Cost Comparison

Grok Imagine Video is 20% cheaper than WAN v2.7. Here's how credits add up at scale.

VolumeWAN v2.7Grok Imagine Video
5 videos 500 400
10 videos 1,000 800
25 videos 2,500 2,000

Strengths & Weaknesses

Alibaba

WAN v2.7

Strengths
  • + Multi-shot storytelling
  • + Longer videos (up to 15s)
  • + Reference-to-video for character consistency
  • + Up to 15-second clips at 1080p
Weaknesses
  • - More expensive (100 vs 80 credits)
  • - No native audio
xAI

Grok Imagine Video

Strengths
  • + More affordable (80 vs 100 credits)
  • + Faster generation speed
  • + Fast cinematic video with sound
  • + Native audio generation
  • + #1 on multiple video leaderboards
Weaknesses
  • - Shorter max duration (10s vs 15s)

WAN v2.7 vs Grok Imagine Video: Which to Pick?

Video with sound effects or dialogue

Grok Imagine Video generates native audio alongside the video — no need to add sound in post-production.

Grok Imagine Video

Longer clips for storytelling

WAN v2.7 supports up to 15 second clips, giving you more room for complete scenes.

WAN v2.7

Producing multiple clips on a budget

At 80 credits per video, Grok Imagine Video lets you generate more clips and pick the best ones.

Grok Imagine Video

Cinematic quality for a hero clip

WAN v2.7 is the premium option when every frame counts — final cuts, presentations, or social media covers.

WAN v2.7

WAN v2.7 vs Grok Imagine Video: FAQ

Practical answers before you start creating.

AI generated video
AI generated video
AI generated video
AI generated video

Try WAN v2.7 & Grok Imagine Video

Compare WAN v2.7, Grok Imagine Video, and 10+ AI video models in one workspace. Switch models freely, same credits.

Start Creating Videos