Alibaba's latest upgrade adds 1080p reference workflows at 100 credits vs the older model at 70 credits.
WAN v2.7 and WAN v2.6 are both made by Alibaba, but they serve different purposes. Alibaba's latest video model with 1080p output, reference-to-video, and up to 15-second clips. Meanwhile, alibaba's latest video model with multi-shot prompts and reference-to-video support. Choosing between them comes down to what you prioritize: Multi-shot storytelling, or Multi-shot storytelling.
At 70 credits, WAN v2.6 costs 30 credits less than WAN v2.7 (100 credits). The question is whether the extra cost of WAN v2.7 translates into meaningfully better results for your use case. For multi-shot storytelling, reference-based generation, long-form clips, WAN v2.6 is hard to beat at its price point. But if you need multi-shot storytelling, reference-based generation, longer 1080p clips, WAN v2.7 may justify the premium.
Updated August 2026
WAN v2.6 (70 credits) offers better value for everyday use, especially for multi-shot storytelling. WAN v2.7 (100 credits) is worth the premium when you need multi-shot storytelling. Both are available on Melies — try each with a test prompt to see which fits your style.
| Provider | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Released | Jul 2026 | Mar 2026 |
| Cost | 100 | 70 |
| Speed | Medium | Medium |
| Max duration | 15 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Image input | ||
| Audio |
WAN v2.6 is 30% cheaper than WAN v2.7. Here's how credits add up at scale.
| Volume | WAN v2.7 | WAN v2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 videos | 500 | 350 |
| 10 videos | 1,000 | 700 |
| 25 videos | 2,500 | 1,750 |
At 70 credits per video, WAN v2.6 lets you generate more clips and pick the best ones.
WAN v2.7 is the premium option when every frame counts — final cuts, presentations, or social media covers.
Practical answers before you start creating.





Compare WAN v2.7, WAN v2.6, and 10+ AI video models in one workspace. Switch models freely, same credits.
Start Creating Videos