Both 5 credits. Google's Imagen 4 Fast vs FLUX.2 Klein for budget image generation.
Imagen 4 Fast from Google and FLUX.2 [klein] from Black Forest Labs represent two different approaches to AI image generation. Google's fast image model with high-quality generation at ultra-low cost. On the other side, fast and efficient 4B model optimized for rapid iteration and prototyping.
Both models cost 5 credits per generation, so the decision comes down to capabilities rather than budget. Imagen 4 Fast excels at fast iteration, budget-friendly generation, quick high-quality drafts, while FLUX.2 [klein] is better suited for quick previews, rapid iteration, prototyping on a budget.
Updated April 2026
Both cost 5 credits, so pick based on your needs. Go with Imagen 4 Fast for fast iteration. Choose FLUX.2 [klein] if you need quick previews. Since they're the same price on Melies, try both and see which output style you prefer.
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Jan 2026 |
| Cost | 5 | 5 |
| Speed | Fastest | Fastest |
| Reference images | ||
| Editing |
Both models cost the same. Here's how credits add up at scale.
| Volume | Imagen 4 Fast | FLUX.2 [klein] |
|---|---|---|
| 10 images | 50 | 50 |
| 50 images | 250 | 250 |
| 100 images | 500 | 500 |
At 5 credits per image, Imagen 4 Fast gives you more generations for your plan. Good enough quality for most everyday use.





Compare Imagen 4 Fast, FLUX.2 [klein], and 15+ AI image models side by side. Switch models with one click, same credits.
Start Generating Images