Character elements vs frame-level control — which image animation approach fits?
Kling v3 Standard from Kuaishou and WAN v2.2 from Alibaba represent two different approaches to AI video generation. Kling's image-to-video model with custom character elements and end-frame control. On the other side, alibaba's image-to-video model with granular frame and interpolation controls.
Both models cost 60 credits per generation, so the decision comes down to capabilities rather than budget. Kling v3 Standard excels at image animation, character-driven video, controlled start/end frames, while WAN v2.2 is better suited for frame-precise animation, interpolation workflows, technical control.
Updated March 2026
Both cost 60 credits, so pick based on your needs. Go with Kling v3 Standard for image animation. Choose WAN v2.2 if you need frame-precise animation. Since they're the same price on Melies, try both and see which output style you prefer.
| Provider | Kuaishou | Alibaba |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2025 |
| Cost | 60 | 60 |
| Speed | Medium | Medium |
| Max duration | 15 seconds | ~5 seconds at defaults (81 frames / 16fps) |
| Image input | ||
| Audio | ||
| Resolutions | Standard | 480p, 580p, 720p |
Both models cost the same. Here's how credits add up at scale.
| Volume | Kling v3 Standard | WAN v2.2 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 videos | 300 | 300 |
| 10 videos | 600 | 600 |
| 25 videos | 1,500 | 1,500 |
Kling v3 Standard generates native audio alongside the video — no need to add sound in post-production.
WAN v2.2 supports up to NaN second clips, giving you more room for complete scenes.
At 60 credits per video, Kling v3 Standard lets you generate more clips and pick the best ones.





Compare Kling v3 Standard, WAN v2.2, and 10+ AI video models in one workspace. Switch models freely, same credits.
Start Creating Videos