LTX 2.5 vs LTX 2.3
LTX 2.5 prioritizes final-quality synchronized audio and frame control, while LTX 2.3 keeps 4K generation affordable.
LTX 2.5 and LTX 2.3 are both made by Lightricks, but they serve different purposes. Lightricks' quality-optimized audio-video model with native sound, 1080p output, and first-last-frame control. Meanwhile, lightricks' latest model with 4K output, native audio, and a sharper VAE. Choosing between them comes down to what you prioritize: Final-quality audio-video shots, or High-resolution video.
At 50 credits, LTX 2.3 costs 94 credits less than LTX 2.5 (144 credits). The question is whether the extra cost of LTX 2.5 translates into meaningfully better results for your use case. For high-resolution video, fast generation, 4k output, open-source workflows, LTX 2.3 is hard to beat at its price point. But if you need final-quality audio-video shots, dialogue and sound, portrait or landscape delivery, and controlled frame transitions, LTX 2.5 may justify the premium.
Updated August 2026
LTX 2.5 costs 94 credits more per generation — that adds up fast. Start with LTX 2.3 for most work. It handles high-resolution video, fast generation, 4k output, open-source workflows well. Save LTX 2.5 for when you specifically need final-quality audio-video shots and the quality difference matters.
LTX 2.5 vs LTX 2.3: How They Compare
 LTX 2.5 | LTX 2.3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Lightricks | Lightricks |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Mar 2026 |
| Cost | 144 | 50 |
| Speed | Medium | Fast |
| Max duration | 10 seconds | 10 seconds |
| Image input | ||
| Audio | ||
| Resolutions | 720p, 1080p | 1080p, 1440p, 2160p |
LTX 2.5 vs LTX 2.3: Cost Comparison
LTX 2.3 is 65% cheaper than LTX 2.5. Here's how credits add up at scale.
| Volume | LTX 2.5 | LTX 2.3 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 videos | 720 | 250 |
| 10 videos | 1,440 | 500 |
| 25 videos | 3,600 | 1,250 |
Strengths & Weaknesses
LTX 2.5
- + Final-quality audio-video shots
- + Joint video and synchronized audio generation
- + Quality-optimized Pro inference
- + First and last frame transition control
- + Prompts up to 5,000 characters
- - More expensive (144 vs 50 credits)
LTX 2.3
- + More affordable (50 vs 144 credits)
- + Faster generation speed
- + High-resolution video
- + Up to 4K (2160p) output
- + Native audio generation
- - Higher price point relative to speed tier
LTX 2.5 vs LTX 2.3: Which to Pick?
Producing multiple clips on a budget
At 50 credits per video, LTX 2.3 lets you generate more clips and pick the best ones.
Cinematic quality for a hero clip
LTX 2.5 is the premium option when every frame counts — final cuts, presentations, or social media covers.
LTX 2.5 vs LTX 2.3: FAQ
Practical answers before you start creating.
Try LTX 2.5 & LTX 2.3
Compare LTX 2.5, LTX 2.3, and 10+ AI video models in one workspace. Switch models freely, same credits.
Start Creating Videos
