4K fast generation with audio at 50 credits vs 15-second 1080p clips at 70 credits.
LTX 2.3 from Lightricks and WAN v2.6 from Alibaba represent two different approaches to AI video generation. Lightricks' latest model with 4K output, native audio, and a sharper VAE. On the other side, alibaba's latest video model with multi-shot prompts and reference-to-video support.
At 50 credits, LTX 2.3 costs 20 credits less than WAN v2.6 (70 credits). The question is whether the extra cost of WAN v2.6 translates into meaningfully better results for your use case. For high-resolution video, fast generation, 4k output, open-source workflows, LTX 2.3 is hard to beat at its price point. But if you need multi-shot storytelling, reference-based generation, long-form clips, WAN v2.6 may justify the premium.
Updated April 2026
LTX 2.3 (50 credits) offers better value for everyday use, especially for high-resolution video. WAN v2.6 (70 credits) is worth the premium when you need multi-shot storytelling. Both are available on Melies — try each with a test prompt to see which fits your style.
| Provider | Lightricks | Alibaba |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Mar 2026 |
| Cost | 50 | 70 |
| Speed | Fast | Medium |
| Max duration | 10 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Image input | ||
| Audio | ||
| Resolutions | 1080p, 1440p, 2160p | 720p, 1080p |
LTX 2.3 is 29% cheaper than WAN v2.6. Here's how credits add up at scale.
| Volume | LTX 2.3 | WAN v2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 videos | 250 | 350 |
| 10 videos | 500 | 700 |
| 25 videos | 1,250 | 1,750 |
LTX 2.3 generates native audio alongside the video — no need to add sound in post-production.
WAN v2.6 supports up to 15 second clips, giving you more room for complete scenes.
At 50 credits per video, LTX 2.3 lets you generate more clips and pick the best ones.
WAN v2.6 is the premium option when every frame counts — final cuts, presentations, or social media covers.





Compare LTX 2.3, WAN v2.6, and 10+ AI video models in one workspace. Switch models freely, same credits.
Start Creating Videos