Melies
Video Model Comparison

LTX 2.3 vs WAN v2.6

4K fast generation with audio at 50 credits vs 15-second 1080p clips at 70 credits.

LTX 2.3 from Lightricks and WAN v2.6 from Alibaba represent two different approaches to AI video generation. Lightricks' latest model with 4K output, native audio, and a sharper VAE. On the other side, alibaba's latest video model with multi-shot prompts and reference-to-video support.

At 50 credits, LTX 2.3 costs 20 credits less than WAN v2.6 (70 credits). The question is whether the extra cost of WAN v2.6 translates into meaningfully better results for your use case. For high-resolution video, fast generation, 4k output, open-source workflows, LTX 2.3 is hard to beat at its price point. But if you need multi-shot storytelling, reference-based generation, long-form clips, WAN v2.6 may justify the premium.

Updated April 2026

The Bottom Line

LTX 2.3 (50 credits) offers better value for everyday use, especially for high-resolution video. WAN v2.6 (70 credits) is worth the premium when you need multi-shot storytelling. Both are available on Melies — try each with a test prompt to see which fits your style.

LTX 2.3 vs WAN v2.6: How They Compare

LightricksLTX 2.3
AlibabaWAN v2.6
ProviderLightricksAlibaba
ReleasedMar 2026Mar 2026
Cost
50
70
SpeedFastMedium
Max duration10 seconds15 seconds
Image input
Audio
Resolutions1080p, 1440p, 2160p720p, 1080p

LTX 2.3 vs WAN v2.6: Cost Comparison

LTX 2.3 is 29% cheaper than WAN v2.6. Here's how credits add up at scale.

VolumeLTX 2.3WAN v2.6
5 videos 250 350
10 videos 500 700
25 videos 1,250 1,750

Strengths & Weaknesses

Lightricks

LTX 2.3

Strengths
  • + More affordable (50 vs 70 credits)
  • + Faster generation speed
  • + High-resolution video
  • + Native audio generation
  • + Up to 4K (2160p) output
Weaknesses
  • - Shorter max duration (10s vs 15s)
Alibaba

WAN v2.6

Strengths
  • + Multi-shot storytelling
  • + Longer videos (up to 15s)
  • + Reference-to-video for character consistency
  • + Up to 15-second clips
Weaknesses
  • - More expensive (70 vs 50 credits)
  • - No native audio

LTX 2.3 vs WAN v2.6: Which to Pick?

Video with sound effects or dialogue

LTX 2.3 generates native audio alongside the video — no need to add sound in post-production.

LTX 2.3

Longer clips for storytelling

WAN v2.6 supports up to 15 second clips, giving you more room for complete scenes.

WAN v2.6

Producing multiple clips on a budget

At 50 credits per video, LTX 2.3 lets you generate more clips and pick the best ones.

LTX 2.3

Cinematic quality for a hero clip

WAN v2.6 is the premium option when every frame counts — final cuts, presentations, or social media covers.

WAN v2.6

LTX 2.3 vs WAN v2.6: FAQ

AI generated video
AI generated video
AI generated video
AI generated video

Try LTX 2.3 & WAN v2.6

Compare LTX 2.3, WAN v2.6, and 10+ AI video models in one workspace. Switch models freely, same credits.

Start Creating Videos