Melies
Video Model Comparison

Veo 3.1 Lite vs LTX 2.3

Veo Lite starts at 60 credits while LTX 2.3 starts at 50. Both support image animation and audio.

Veo 3.1 Lite from Google and LTX 2.3 from Lightricks represent two different approaches to AI video generation. A cost-efficient Veo 3.1 tier with native audio, image-to-video, and first-last-frame control. On the other side, lightricks' latest model with 4K output, native audio, and a sharper VAE.

At 50 credits, LTX 2.3 costs 10 credits less than Veo 3.1 Lite (60 credits). The question is whether the extra cost of Veo 3.1 Lite translates into meaningfully better results for your use case. For high-resolution video, fast generation, 4k output, open-source workflows, LTX 2.3 is hard to beat at its price point. But if you need affordable veo-quality video with sound and cinematic image animation, Veo 3.1 Lite may justify the premium.

Updated August 2026

The Bottom Line

LTX 2.3 (50 credits) offers better value for everyday use, especially for high-resolution video. Veo 3.1 Lite (60 credits) is worth the premium when you need affordable veo-quality video with sound and cinematic image animation. Both are available on Melies — try each with a test prompt to see which fits your style.

Veo 3.1 Lite vs LTX 2.3: How They Compare

GoogleVeo 3.1 Lite
LightricksLTX 2.3
ProviderGoogleLightricks
ReleasedJul 2026Mar 2026
Cost
60
50
SpeedMediumFast
Max duration8 seconds10 seconds
Image input
Audio
Resolutions720p, 1080p1080p, 1440p, 2160p

Veo 3.1 Lite vs LTX 2.3: Cost Comparison

LTX 2.3 is 17% cheaper than Veo 3.1 Lite. Here's how credits add up at scale.

VolumeVeo 3.1 LiteLTX 2.3
5 videos 300 250
10 videos 600 500
25 videos 1,500 1,250

Strengths & Weaknesses

Google

Veo 3.1 Lite

Strengths
  • + Affordable Veo-quality video with sound and cinematic image animation
  • + Cost-efficient Veo generation
  • + Image-to-video support
  • + First-last-frame control
  • + Up to 1080p resolution
Weaknesses
  • - More expensive (60 vs 50 credits)
  • - Shorter max duration (8s vs 10s)
Lightricks

LTX 2.3

Strengths
  • + More affordable (50 vs 60 credits)
  • + Faster generation speed
  • + High-resolution video
  • + Longer videos (up to 10s)
  • + Up to 4K (2160p) output
Weaknesses
  • - Higher price point relative to speed tier

Veo 3.1 Lite vs LTX 2.3: Which to Pick?

Longer clips for storytelling

LTX 2.3 supports up to 10 second clips, giving you more room for complete scenes.

LTX 2.3

Producing multiple clips on a budget

At 50 credits per video, LTX 2.3 lets you generate more clips and pick the best ones.

LTX 2.3

Cinematic quality for a hero clip

Veo 3.1 Lite is the premium option when every frame counts — final cuts, presentations, or social media covers.

Veo 3.1 Lite

Veo 3.1 Lite vs LTX 2.3: FAQ

Practical answers before you start creating.

AI generated video
AI generated video
AI generated video
AI generated video

Try Veo 3.1 Lite & LTX 2.3

Compare Veo 3.1 Lite, LTX 2.3, and 10+ AI video models in one workspace. Switch models freely, same credits.

Start Creating Videos