Distilled eight-step speed compared with the flexible open-weight FLUX development model.
FLUX.2 [turbo] and Flux Dev are both made by Black Forest Labs, but they serve different purposes. A distilled FLUX.2 model for rapid generation and natural-language editing at low inference cost. Meanwhile, open-weight 12B model ideal for experimentation and custom workflows. Choosing between them comes down to what you prioritize: Fast drafts, or Experimentation.
Both models cost 10 credits per generation, so the decision comes down to capabilities rather than budget. FLUX.2 [turbo] excels at fast drafts, prompt iteration, high-volume generation, and affordable edits, while Flux Dev is better suited for experimentation, custom workflows, good value.
Updated August 2026
Both cost 10 credits, so pick based on your needs. Go with FLUX.2 [turbo] for fast drafts. Choose Flux Dev if you need experimentation. Since they're the same price on Melies, try both and see which output style you prefer.
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Black Forest Labs |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Aug 2024 |
| Cost | 10 | 10 |
| Speed | Fastest | Medium |
| Reference images | Up to 4 | |
| Editing | ||
| WebP output |
Both models cost the same. Here's how credits add up at scale.
| Volume | FLUX.2 [turbo] | Flux Dev |
|---|---|---|
| 10 images | 100 | 100 |
| 50 images | 500 | 500 |
| 100 images | 1,000 | 1,000 |
At 10 credits per image, FLUX.2 [turbo] gives you more generations for your plan. Good enough quality for most everyday use.
FLUX.2 [turbo] supports 4 reference images to keep subjects, styles, and characters consistent across generations.
FLUX.2 [turbo]'s fastest generation means you can test more prompts in less time. Great for exploration.
Practical answers before you start creating.





Compare FLUX.2 [turbo], Flux Dev, and 15+ AI image models side by side. Switch models with one click, same credits.
Start Generating Images