15-second 1080p clips at 70 credits vs character elements at 60 credits. Different video approaches.
WAN v2.6 from Alibaba and Kling v3 Standard from Kuaishou represent two different approaches to AI video generation. Alibaba's latest video model with multi-shot prompts and reference-to-video support. On the other side, kling's image-to-video model with custom character elements and end-frame control.
At 60 credits, Kling v3 Standard costs 10 credits less than WAN v2.6 (70 credits). The question is whether the extra cost of WAN v2.6 translates into meaningfully better results for your use case. For image animation, character-driven video, controlled start/end frames, Kling v3 Standard is hard to beat at its price point. But if you need multi-shot storytelling, reference-based generation, long-form clips, WAN v2.6 may justify the premium.
Updated April 2026
Kling v3 Standard (60 credits) offers better value for everyday use, especially for image animation. WAN v2.6 (70 credits) is worth the premium when you need multi-shot storytelling. Both are available on Melies — try each with a test prompt to see which fits your style.
| Provider | Alibaba | Kuaishou |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Feb 2026 |
| Cost | 70 | 60 |
| Speed | Medium | Medium |
| Max duration | 15 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Image input | ||
| Audio | ||
| Resolutions | 720p, 1080p | Standard |
Kling v3 Standard is 14% cheaper than WAN v2.6. Here's how credits add up at scale.
| Volume | WAN v2.6 | Kling v3 Standard |
|---|---|---|
| 5 videos | 350 | 300 |
| 10 videos | 700 | 600 |
| 25 videos | 1,750 | 1,500 |
Kling v3 Standard generates native audio alongside the video — no need to add sound in post-production.
At 60 credits per video, Kling v3 Standard lets you generate more clips and pick the best ones.
WAN v2.6 is the premium option when every frame counts — final cuts, presentations, or social media covers.





Compare WAN v2.6, Kling v3 Standard, and 10+ AI video models in one workspace. Switch models freely, same credits.
Start Creating Videos