OpenAI's 12-second cinematic model vs Google's 4K powerhouse. Both premium, different strengths.
Sora 2 Pro from OpenAI and Veo 3.1 from Google represent two different approaches to AI video generation. OpenAI's flagship video model with native synchronized audio and cinematic quality. On the other side, google's most advanced video model with native audio, 4K resolution, and reference image support.
At 200 credits, Sora 2 Pro costs 200 credits less than Veo 3.1 (400 credits). The question is whether the extra cost of Veo 3.1 translates into meaningfully better results for your use case. For cinematic video with dialogue, high-fidelity audio-visual generation, Sora 2 Pro is hard to beat at its price point. But if you need highest quality video with sound, cinematic 4k output, Veo 3.1 may justify the premium.
Updated April 2026
Veo 3.1 costs 200 credits more per generation — that adds up fast. Start with Sora 2 Pro for most work. It handles cinematic video with dialogue, high-fidelity audio-visual generation well. Save Veo 3.1 for when you specifically need highest quality video with sound and the quality difference matters.
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Released | Sep 2025 | Oct 2025 |
| Cost | 200 | 400 |
| Speed | Slower | Slower |
| Max duration | 12 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Image input | ||
| Audio | ||
| Resolutions | 720p, 1080p | 720p, 1080p, 4K |
Sora 2 Pro is 50% cheaper than Veo 3.1. Here's how credits add up at scale.
| Volume | Sora 2 Pro | Veo 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 videos | 1,000 | 2,000 |
| 10 videos | 2,000 | 4,000 |
| 25 videos | 5,000 | 10,000 |
Sora 2 Pro supports up to 12 second clips, giving you more room for complete scenes.
At 200 credits per video, Sora 2 Pro lets you generate more clips and pick the best ones.
Veo 3.1 is the premium option when every frame counts — final cuts, presentations, or social media covers.





Compare Sora 2 Pro, Veo 3.1, and 10+ AI video models in one workspace. Switch models freely, same credits.
Start Creating Videos