Google's cinematic 4K vs Lightricks' camera controls — premium vs budget compared.
Veo 3.1 from Google and LTX 2 Pro from Lightricks represent two different approaches to AI video generation. Google's most advanced video model with native audio, 4K resolution, and reference image support. On the other side, lightricks' model with camera LoRA presets, image-to-video support, and multiple output formats.
At 50 credits, LTX 2 Pro costs 350 credits less than Veo 3.1 (400 credits). The question is whether the extra cost of Veo 3.1 translates into meaningfully better results for your use case. For camera movement effects, multiple export formats, fast generation, LTX 2 Pro is hard to beat at its price point. But if you need highest quality video with sound, cinematic 4k output, Veo 3.1 may justify the premium.
Updated March 2026
Veo 3.1 costs 350 credits more per generation — that adds up fast. Start with LTX 2 Pro for most work. It handles camera movement effects, multiple export formats, fast generation well. Save Veo 3.1 for when you specifically need highest quality video with sound and the quality difference matters.
| Provider | Lightricks | |
| Released | Oct 2025 | Oct 2025 |
| Cost | 400 | 50 |
| Speed | Slower | Fast |
| Max duration | 8 seconds | ~4.8 seconds at defaults (121 frames / 25fps) |
| Image input | ||
| Audio | ||
| Resolutions | 720p, 1080p, 4K | Standard |
LTX 2 Pro is 88% cheaper than Veo 3.1. Here's how credits add up at scale.
| Volume | Veo 3.1 | LTX 2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5 videos | 2,000 | 250 |
| 10 videos | 4,000 | 500 |
| 25 videos | 10,000 | 1,250 |
LTX 2 Pro supports up to NaN second clips, giving you more room for complete scenes.
At 50 credits per video, LTX 2 Pro lets you generate more clips and pick the best ones.
Veo 3.1 is the premium option when every frame counts — final cuts, presentations, or social media covers.





Compare Veo 3.1, LTX 2 Pro, and 10+ AI video models in one workspace. Switch models freely, same credits.
Start Creating Videos