Vidu Q3 vs Luma Ray 3.2
Vidu Q3 at 100 credits with audio and references vs Luma Ray 3.2 at 150 credits with video editing.
Vidu Q3 from Shengshu and Luma Ray 3.2 from Luma represent two different approaches to AI video generation. Shengshu's latest video model with native audio, reference-to-video for character consistency, and up to 1080p resolution. On the other side, luma's cinematic video model with text, image, and video-to-video workflows at up to 1080p resolution.
At 100 credits, Vidu Q3 costs 50 credits less than Luma Ray 3.2 (150 credits). The question is whether the extra cost of Luma Ray 3.2 translates into meaningfully better results for your use case. For character-consistent video, reference-based generation, video with audio, Vidu Q3 is hard to beat at its price point. But if you need cinematic video, video restyling, and ultrawide output, Luma Ray 3.2 may justify the premium.
Updated August 2026
Vidu Q3 (100 credits) offers better value for everyday use, especially for character-consistent video. Luma Ray 3.2 (150 credits) is worth the premium when you need cinematic video. Both are available on Melies — try each with a test prompt to see which fits your style.
Vidu Q3 vs Luma Ray 3.2: How They Compare
 Vidu Q3 |  Luma Ray 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Shengshu | Luma |
| Released | May 2026 | Jun 2026 |
| Cost | 100 | 150 |
| Speed | Medium | Medium |
| Max duration | 10 seconds | 10 seconds |
| Image input | ||
| Audio |
Vidu Q3 vs Luma Ray 3.2: Cost Comparison
Vidu Q3 is 33% cheaper than Luma Ray 3.2. Here's how credits add up at scale.
| Volume | Vidu Q3 | Luma Ray 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 videos | 500 | 750 |
| 10 videos | 1,000 | 1,500 |
| 25 videos | 2,500 | 3,750 |
Strengths & Weaknesses
Vidu Q3
- + More affordable (100 vs 150 credits)
- + Character-consistent video
- + Native audio generation
- + Reference-to-video for character consistency
- - Higher price point relative to speed tier
Luma Ray 3.2
- + Cinematic video
- + Video-to-video editing
- + 6 aspect ratio options including 21:9
- + 540p, 720p, and 1080p output
- + 5 and 10-second generation
- - More expensive (150 vs 100 credits)
- - No native audio
Vidu Q3 vs Luma Ray 3.2: Which to Pick?
Video with sound effects or dialogue
Vidu Q3 generates native audio alongside the video — no need to add sound in post-production.
Producing multiple clips on a budget
At 100 credits per video, Vidu Q3 lets you generate more clips and pick the best ones.
Cinematic quality for a hero clip
Luma Ray 3.2 is the premium option when every frame counts — final cuts, presentations, or social media covers.
Vidu Q3 vs Luma Ray 3.2: FAQ
Practical answers before you start creating.
Try Vidu Q3 & Luma Ray 3.2
Compare Vidu Q3, Luma Ray 3.2, and 10+ AI video models in one workspace. Switch models freely, same credits.
Start Creating Videos
